Weston Meehan

In to mean solar days society at that place is a war going on, a battle to control our minds, hearts, and souls with a simple idea. An idea so dangerous that it non only has it indoctrinated us as a generation, simply indoctrinating future generations with extinct so much has a scrap of scientific grounds. An idea that motilitys our livelihood, why we be here, why we do what we do, and where do we go when it is all said and d star. This idea is k instantaneouslyn as the ontogenyary hypothesis and its concepts derived more or less 200 days ago by Charles Darwin in his book the Origin of Species.Darwin states I see no full(a) reasons why the views given in this volume should shock the religious views of anyone. (1859, pp. 520) Claiming Evolution does not personify would be as empirical as proving divinity does hold out. In these arguments in that respect is no middle ground, either divinity fudge does exist or he does not, either evolution is received or it is not. on that point is only one way to prove the evidence and that is to seek it out with examination. Would such evidence exist? If so what could possibly the nature of this evidence?Before the Evolutionary theorys inception the four burning at the stake questions of manhood has been who am I, where did I eff from, why am I here, and where do I go when I die? The answer to these questions has forever and a day been some sort of religion, and that this conception has a designer with an incredible plan. right away as conviction has progressed a very dangerous solution was introduced to the instauration and with its arrival it is changing the very fabric of humanity. The new religion of the day is science and this affects our legal system, school system, and position process.These effects over time can be detrimental to the minds and morals of us as a society. One of the to the highest degree basic and fundamental questions of the human mind is the question, does God exist? The one thing all human has in coarse is having a argonaview. A worldview is how you view the world. There are two slipway you can view this world. Some people look at this world and say, its amazing this came from evolution that is the Evolutionists worldview. Others say, this world has incredible design in that respect must be a designer this is the Creationists worldview.These two views are polar- antagonist from each other in a clash where one facial expression has to be wrong. When mentioning Evolution, keep in mind that in that respect are half dozen theories and basis to the word of honor evolve. Cosmic Evolution the origin of time, space, and progeny i. e. the tolerant neck. Chemical Evolution the origin of higher elements from hydrogen. Stellar and world-wide Evolution origin of stars and planets. Organic Evolution the origin of smell. Macroevolution the changing from one kind in to another. Finally, Microevolution variations within kinds.These theories are studi ed in every(prenominal) American education curriculum but only one has scientifically been proven. In a common Webster lexicon from an online website the definition of the Big Bang hypothesis (Cosmic Evolution) is a theory in astronomy the human beings originated billions of years ago in an explosion from a single point of about infinite energy density. (Webster Dictionary Online) Another is Alan Guths theory stating, the perfect observable universe could have evolved from an infinitesimal (Greek for dot) region.Its then tantalizing to go one step further and speculate that the entire universe evolved from literally nothing. (1984 p. 128). The two theories of the creation of the Earth are basically the analogous but the Evolutionists intrust it happened for no reason. The Creationists believe that God was the creator. The first only whenice of the conservation of matter is that, matter (and or energy) cannot be created or destroyed. Thus, if the matter cannot be cre ated nor destroyed then who created this world? The choices still remain, it created itself or somebody created it.Scientifically how can something be created from nothing unless there was a creator? instead of raising questions that are gaudy, scientific, and quite frankly a bit harder to run across I would manage to accustom history as the main bug of discussion. The arguments approximately skeptics tend to stray away from are whether or not Dinosaurs existed with man. As ridiculous as that might sound to do believe that the very thought of such a notion existing could throw away the beliefs of your modern Evolutionists. If dinosaurs did exist then the Evolutionary theory would be tout ensemble and utterly false and visa versa for creation.This topic is rarely touched establish on just due to most of societies presuppositions on the matter and considering substitute evidence with an unbiased open mind. Lets start with the question what happened to the dinosaurs? and ther e are scores of theories on this matter. The main theory is that a comet struck the earth, and the dust that was raised blockade out the sun. When the sun was blocked out the climate turned cold and the cold-blooded animals couldnt survive. The disgrace in this theory is that we still have animals today such as alligators, crocodiles, and Komodo bangdrakes and supposedly these species date back to before the inosaurs were evolved (according to Evolution). Another theory is E. Baldwins exotic notion to say that they use to eat a aperient plant and when this plant went extinct the dinosaurs died out due to constipation. (2002, pp. 210) According to the intelligence there was a major catastrophe that wiped out the Dinosaurs as tumesce as most of the life on Earth. This was the great genesis flood, which was world-wide destroying all of existence except a man named Noah, his family, and two of every kind of animal to be taken aboard an Ark and to repopulate the Earth.Logically, Noah would of obtained only babe animals. This is for three reasons they eat less, sleep more, and take up less room. This cover of a global flood is not only found in the Bible but in every major assimilations history such as China, Mesopotamia, and Polynesian cultures. In 1841 the first use of the call Dinosauria (meaning terrible lizard) was created by the famous British anatomist and Paleontologist Sir Richard Owen. The term was used for the first time at a meeting of the British Association of the Advancement of science held in Plymouth. No reptile now exists which provides a complicated and thecodont dentition with limbs so proportionally king-sized and strong having such fountainhead-developed marrow bones and sustaining the weight of the trunk by synchrondrosis or anchylosis to so long and complicated a sacrum, as in the order Dinosauria. (Owen 42) After that meeting the word Dinosaur became a favourite term to describe these giant lizards that were being discovered by paleontologists. During the 1800s after the first discovery of theses fossils scientists began to look for clue to what had happened to these terrible lizards.Unfortunately the contract was on the rocks and buried fossils and failed to examine history on what had really happened. Examining antique history and the historical record you will not find the word dinosaur remember the word dinosaur was not created until 1841. Every culture shared a common name for these creatures but the most familiar is the name genus Draco. sluice in our topical anaesthetic librarys dictionary the definition of dragon shares a chilling motion-picture show. Even the old dictionaries recognize these dragons to be real and not apart of myth.It seems that all cultures have disparate names for these dragons such as the list provided on page 13. firedrake history is nearly universal through ancient cultures. Where did this concept derive? Why is it so universal among cultures that are separated by continents? How did societies through out the world describe, etch, draw, and sew these creatures with such uniformity if they were not of eyewitness accounts? Certain things that arent shown to us growing up when learning the evolutionary theory as well as all of history are all of the artistic production of the ancient cultures and the people of the culture depicting dinosaurs.It is safe to say that most of all the ancient art are mainly illustrations of everyday life and this gives us a good idea of how these cultures hunted, lived, and the ceremonies they practiced. The highly technical purification of the Nazca Indians off the coast of Peru flourished from about 1 A. D. to 750 A. D. These cultures produced an array of technologies as well as crafts including ceramics, textiles, and geoglyphs. Today it is still unknown how this culture produced these geoglyphs called the Nazca lines. The Nazca Indians also produced thousands of carvings on burial stones, these carvings are kno wn as the Ica stones.There have been over 16,000 of these rum stone found over the years. They contain depictions of daily life, battle scenes, modern technologies, and most amazingly dinosaurs. or so skeptics try to debunk the Ica stones being a hoax or created during our time period, but the evidence points otherwise. Other than the Ica stones there has been thousands of pieces of ancient art depicting dinosaurs found in many different cultures spreading over the planet. The authenticity of this art has divided skeptics, but most that have no preconceived biases believe in their genuine nature.Here are just some of the different examples of the uniformity of these creatures that are shared. Again, how could each culture depict these dinosaurs if they were not of eyewitness accounts? Could it be possible that dinosaurs still exist today? For at least a hundred years there have been many reputable reports in position speaking countries of comprehend a dinosaur interchangeable creature in the lakes of Loch Ness, Champlain, and Ogopogo. The accounts describe a plesiosaur or a piss dwelling dinosaur. These lakes are vast bodies of water reaching depths of four hundred feet in certain parts.To add to the elusiveness of these creatures it is believed that like crocodiles, alligators, and caimans this type of dinosaur is nocturnal. The most intriguing of eyewitness reports do not come from the lakes of England, Scotland, or America but from the darkest regions of the African Congo a oversupply named Likoula. Likoula is the largest swamp in the world, 55,000 square miles in size and remains 80 percent unexplored. Most civilized people do not accident into these swamps due to the harsh conditions, but tribes people vivacious in the swamp say that several creatures that are apparent dinosaurs are still alive today.Theres a creature the natives call Mokele-Embembe exposit as a large animal 16 to 32 feet in length with a long neck and a tail. It is also alleg ed(a) that the reddish-brow to gray, which lives in the swamp and only eats on vegetation. (Half-God, Half-Beast, 1999) The National geographic show The Beast Man presented an episode where the host queryed a local villager and the experiences he had with the creature. The villager stated, it was a long time ago, I was scared and ran away. (Beast Man) This shows the causation of the creature and how scary it can appear.The Bible shares a probable depiction of this very same creature, behold now behemoth, which I made with thee he eateth grass as an ox. Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the belly button of his belly. He moveth his tail like a cedar the sinews of his stones are cloaked together. His bones are as strong pieces of brass his bones are like bars of iron. He is the chief of the ways of God he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him. (King James Bible, Job. 40. 15-19) The dangers of the theory of Evolution have affected and corru pted the minds of people for generations.With the evidence shown the allegiance put in to this theory brings loyalty similar to no other. Most scientists put all of their religion in science just like as if it were a religion. As a Christian would lay their faith in to the Bible their faith lies in theories that are still not proven today. I chose to interview an Environmental Science professor at our college to question his openness and possibility of such a notion. In my interview with professor Meizeka I asked, if dinosaurs still existed and what would that do to the evolutionary theory? He then stated its not possible when I told him about the eyewitness accounts in the Likoula Swamp he stammered around the question stating it just doesntyoure certainly going to find species that we neer thought existed, but a large scale dinosaur hard to believe. My question never seemed to be answered if the theory would be shaken or not but maybe his silence speaks volumes. Why are these issues confronted with such skepticism? What would be the reasoning behind not thoroughly accessing the possibility of this phenomenon?In terminal through out all of my research and reflecting on my thesis, the Evolutionary Theory has indeed indoctrinated society. The majority of scientists would rather reject the possibility of dinosaurs existence with man to better enforce their belief system. The scariest notion is what if this theory was made to go along our generation and future generations in the belief of creation. (Word Count) 2231 ? Dragons in Different Cultures 1. Arabic ah-teen (pl. tah-neen), (Al)Tineen, Plural (Al)Tananeen ? 2. Athebascin (Alasken) Manchu 3. ?Austrian Drachn, Lindwurm? 4.Bulgarian drakon (phonetic), a? aeii (Actual spelling) ? 5. Catalan (N/E Spain) drac ? 6. Chinese lung/long, Liung (Hakka dialect) ? Chinese old & new ? 7. Croatian/Serbian zmaj (pronounced zmai means Dragon), azdaja (pronounced azhdaya means Hydra) ? 8. Czech Drak, Draeek (Draaachek) ? 9. Danish drage 10. ?Dansk drage ? 11. Draconian Khoth, (pl. Khothu)? Driigaran (music language) C4 G4 C5 D5 B5 C5? Double-Dutch dridi-gag-dridi-gen? 12. Dutch draak ? 13. Elven/Drow Tagnikzur ? 14. Egg-Latin Dreggageggon ? 15. English dragon ? English (Middle) dragun, dragoun ? 16.English (Old) draca ? Enochian Vovin (Voh-een)? 17. Esperanto drako, dragono? 18. Estonian draakon, lohe, lohemadu or tuuleuss (Wind Snake), lendav madu? 19. Euskera (dialect of the Basque Country) Erensuge ? 20. Faeroese eitt dreki, eitt flogdreki, ein fraenarormur ? Finnish lohikaarme, draakki, dragoni? 21. excitation Witch tongue Katash wei vorki (kah-TASH whey VOR-key) ? 22. Flambian kazyeeqen (comes from kazyee-aqen, inflammation lizard) 23. ?Flemmish Draeke? French dragon,dragun, dargon ? 24. Gaelic Arach ? 25. German drache (pl. Drachen), Lindwurm, drake (pl. draken) ? 26. Greek drakon, drako. virile drakos (or thrakos), Female drakena (or thrakena) ? 27. Greek (ancient) Male drakkon (or thra kon), Female drakkina (or thrakena) 28. ?Hawaiian Kelekona, (plural) Na Kelekona ? Hebrew drakon (plural) drakonim, Tanniym ? 29. Hungarian sarkany ? 30. Icelandic dreki 31. ?Indonesian Naga ? I 32. ranian Ejdeha 33. ?Muslim thuban, tinnin ? 34. Italian drago, dragone, volante, dragonessa ? 35. Japanese ryu, tatsu ? 36. Jibberish gidadraggidaen (pronunced gid-a-drag-gid-ah-en)? 37. Klingon lunga puv (pronounced loong-AH poov) Flying Great lizard ? 38. Korean yong ?Latin flying dragon, dracon, draco, dragon, dragoon, serpent,serpens 39. ?Luxembourgian Draach ? Middle earth Ency. Anguloce generic, Ramaloce winged dragon, Uruloce displace breath dragon 40. ?Malay Naga 41. ?Milanese (Italy) Dragh, Draguun,Dragoon ? 42. New Zeland (Maori) tarakona ? 43. Norse ormr ? Norsk drake, dragonet, liten drake ? 44. Norse drage ? Oppish dropagoponop (pronounced drop-ag-op-an-op)? 45. Ourainic Barb Duxobum ? 46. Philippines male dragon suddenly o, female Dragona with a short o and a ? 47. Pig -Latin Agon-dray ? 48. Polish smok 49. ?Portuguese dragao ? 0. Quenya (elven) Loke, winged Ramaloke, sea Lingwiloke, fire Uruloke ? 51. Reinitian (of Reinita) Dralaghajh ? Roman draco ? Romanian Dragon, (pl. Dragoni), Zmeu (pl. Zmei), dracul, drakul ? 52. Russian drakon ? Sanskrit naga (type of snake-human-dragon)? Slovenia Zmaj = Dragon, Hidra = Hydra.? 53. Spanish dragon, El Draque, Brujah? 54. Swedish drake, lindorm ? Swedish (Ancient) flugdrake, floghdraki? 55. Swiss German Dracha ? 56. Tagalog drakon ? 57. Thai mung-korn ? Works Cited Ancient Dinosaur Depictions. Genesis Park. N. p. , n. d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012. http//www. enesispark. com/exhibits/evidence/historical/ancient/dinosaur/. (Internet) Conner, Susan, and Linda Kitchen. Sciences Most Wanted The Top 10 Book of Outrageous Innovators, Deadly Disasters, and Shocking Discoveries. Washington, D. C. Brasseys, 2002. 210. Print. (Book) Crittendon, Jules. Half-God, Half Beast. Boston promise Boston 29 Jan. 1999 n. pag. Print. (Newspaper) Darwin, Charles (1859), The Origin of Species (London A. L. Burt). (Book) Guth, Alan and Paul Steinhardt (1984), The Inflationary Universe, Scientific American, 250 116-128, May. (Magazine) Hawk, Ray, and E. E. Hubbard. What Is the Law of Conservation of Matter? WiseGeek. Conjecture, 24 Sept. 2012. Web. 29 Nov. 2012. . (Internet) Job. King James Bible. Nashville, TN Holman Bible, 1973. Print. (reference) N. p. , n. d. Web. . (Internet) John Meizeka. in the flesh(predicate) interview. 29 Nov. 2012. Nazca Lines. , Peru. N. p. , n. d. Web. 30 Nov. 2012. http//www. sacred-destinations. com/peru/nazca-lines. (Internet)Neilson, William Allan, Thomas A. Knott, and Paul W. Carhart. Websters New International Dictionary of the English Language. Springfield, MA G. & C. Merriam, 1960. Print. (Reference) Owen, Sir Richard. Report on British Fossil Reptiles. divorce II. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 60-204 (1842) 42. Print. (Journal) Say Drag on How to Say Dragon in Many Languages. N. p. , n. d. Web. 29 Nov. 2012. . (Internet) Spain, Pat. Mokele Mbembe. The Beast Man. 7 Dec. 2012. Television. (Media) African nrgwenya ? 58. Afrikaans Draak ? 59.Arabic ah-teen (pl. tah-neen), (Al)Tineen, Plural (Al)Tananeen ? 60. Athebascin (Alasken) Manchu 61. ?Austrian Drachn, Lindwurm? 62. Bulgarian drakon (phonetic), a? aeii (Actual spelling) ? 63. Catalan (N/E Spain) drac ? 64. Chinese lung/long, Liung (Hakka dialect) ? Chinese old & new ? 65. Croatian/Serbian zmaj (pronounced zmai means Dragon), azdaja (pronounced azhdaya means Hydra) ? 66. Czech Drak, Draeek (Draaachek) ? 67. Danish drage 68. ?Dansk drage ? 69. Draconian Khoth, (pl. Khothu)? Driigaran (music language) C4 G4 C5 D5 B5 C5? Double-Dutch dridi-gag-dridi-gen? 70. Dutch draak ? 1. Elven/Drow Tagnikzur ? 72. Egg-Latin Dreggageggon ? 73. English dragon ? English (Middle) dragun, dragoun ? 74. English (Old) draca ? Enochian Vovin (Voh-een)? 75. Esperanto drako, dragono? 76. Estonian draakon, lohe, lohemadu or tuuleuss (Wind Snake), lendav madu? 77. Euskera (dialect of the Basque Country) Erensuge ? 78. Faeroese eitt dreki, eitt flogdreki, ein fraenarormur ? Finnish lohikaarme, draakki, dragoni? 79. Fire Witch tongue Katash wei vorki (kah-TASH whey VOR-key) ? 80. Flambian kazyeeqen (comes from kazyee-aqen, fire lizard) 81. ?Flemmish Draeke? French dragon,dragun, dargon ? 2. Gaelic Arach ? 83. German drache (pl. Drachen), Lindwurm, drake (pl. draken) ? 84. Greek drakon, drako. Male drakos (or thrakos), Female drakena (or thrakena) ? 85. Greek (ancient) Male drakkon (or thrakon), Female drakkina (or thrakena) 86. ?Hawaiian Kelekona, (plural) Na Kelekona ? Hebrew drakon (plural) drakonim, Tanniym ? 87. Hungarian sarkany ? 88. Icelandic dreki 89. ?Indonesian Naga ? I 90. ranian Ejdeha 91. ?Islamic thuban, tinnin ? 92. Italian drago, dragone, volante, dragonessa ? 93. Japanese ryu, tatsu ? 94. Jibberish gidadraggidaen (pronunced gid-a-drag-gid-ah-en)? 95.Kli ngon lunga puv (pronounced loong-AH poov) Flying Great Lizard ? 96. Korean yong ? Latin draco, dracon, draco, dragon, dragoon, serpent,serpens 97. ?Luxembourgian Draach ? Middle earth Ency. Anguloce generic, Ramaloce winged dragon, Uruloce fire breath dragon 98. ?Malay Naga 99. ?Milanese (Italy) Dragh, Draguun,Dragoon ? 100. New Zeland (Maori) tarakona ? 101. Norse ormr ? Norsk drake, dragonet, liten drake ? 102. Norwegian drage ? Oppish dropagoponop (pronounced drop-ag-op-an-op)? 103. Ourainic Barb Duxobum ? 104. Philippines male dragon short o, female Dragona with a short o and a ? 05. Pig-Latin Agon-dray ? 106. Polish smok 107. ?Portuguese dragao ? 108. Quenya (elven) Loke, winged Ramaloke, sea Lingwiloke, fire Uruloke ? 109. Reinitian (of Reinita) Dralaghajh ? Roman draco ? Romanian Dragon, (pl. Dragoni), Zmeu (pl. Zmei), dracul, drakul ? 110. Russian drakon ? Sanskrit naga (type of snake-human-dragon)? Slovenia Zmaj = Dragon, Hidra = Hydra.? 111. Spanish dragon, El Draque, Bru jah? 112. Swedish drake, lindorm ? Swedish (Ancient) flugdrake, floghdraki? 113. Swiss German Dracha ? 114. Tagalog drakon ? 115. Thai mung-korn ? Dragons in Different Cultures